[fdo-internals] RFC42 - Direct ArcSDE Provider :: Ready for Review

[Greg Boone]

I have no issues with this proceeding. I can be the PSC guide.

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Crispin_at_1Spatial
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 4:05 AM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] RFC42 - Direct ArcSDE Provider :: Ready for Review


All,

This has been available for comments for some weeks now.
If there are no additional comments can you please advise as to how this
will get a PSC guide to allow for the voting etc process.

 Many thanks - Crispin



Crispin_at_1Spatial wrote:
> 
> All, 
> 
> I found the previous version of this message was still pending so am
> resending. 
> I got confused between nabble and OSGeo subscriptions!
> 
> Please see the draft RFC available at:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc42
> 
> I hope it will be of interest - especially as a platform for involvement
> and as a potential vehicle to support ArcSDE in 64-bit.
> 
> The instructions for http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfcs do not
> indicate how to get a PSC guide assigned (required I presume) ... how does
> this element work? 
> 
>  Regards, 
> 
>   Crispin 
> 
> 1Spatial.com
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/RFC42-Direct-ArcSDE-Provider-Ready-for-Review-tp3950148p4056591.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals