[fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.5.0 RC1

[Greg Boone]

The way I see it, it is important to have a release of FDO where both the windows and Linux builds are in sync, so if a new Linux build is required, a new Windows build should be posted as well.

Greg

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tom Fukushima
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:18 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.5.0 RC1

Most of those fixes were for the PostgreSQL provider and since that provider is an important one for the OS community, I agree that it would be good to get another Linux drop.

Cheers
Tom

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 11:29 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.5.0 RC1

Hi Greg,

Hmm..  I just took a look at the submission list for branches/3.5 since the beginning of March.  There's been a number of Linux related submissions http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/log/branches/3.5.

I'd be all for doing another Linux drop.  I can generate a new Linux SDK using the build scripts I've been working on.  The scripts strip unnecessary symbols and mark the tarball with the changeset number.  The only caveat is that the SDK will not include the ArcSDE Provider for Linux.

I can also roll the SDK into a MapGuide Linux build.  We might get more community testing done that way.  There's a lot of providers to test...

Regards,
Trevor

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: April 6, 2010 10:57 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.5.0 RC1

I am not aware of the current state of testing with the King Oracle provider. I have not done any myself.

Win32 and Win64 are good to go on Windows. There was no 64 build for Linux, nor was any scheduled.

The RHEL5 SDK should have contained the xerces/xalan/gdal .so files. That seems like an oversight.  We could post an updated Linux SDK file with those files included.

Greg

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 12:10 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.5.0 RC1

Hi Greg,

Do you know if any testing been performed with the King.Oracle provider?  I haven't had a chance to test it myself yet.

Also, are 32 bit and 64 bit builds good to go for both Windows and Linux?  I have success with the 32 bit build on Windows and Linux but have not touched 64 bit yet.

One thing I did notice is that the posted RHEL 5 SDK did not include xerces, xalan, or gdal so's.  Was the SDK compiled against the distro libraries for RHEL 5?

Regards,
 Trevor

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: April 6, 2010 9:49 AM
To: FDO Users Mail List; FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.5.0 RC1

Hi All,

Do we need another RC for FDO or should RC1 be promoted as the official release?

Regards,
Greg

From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:35 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List; FDO Users Mail List
Subject: [fdo-users] FDO 3.5.0 RC1

Hi All,


The FDO 3.5.0 RC1 is now fully accessible at:


http://fdo.osgeo.org/content/fdo-350-downloads



or through the download site at:



http://download.osgeo.org/fdo/3.5.0



Regards,

Greg



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20100406/1db46384/attachment.html