[fdo-internals] MOTION: FDO RFC 51 - Update WFS provider to support 1.1.0

[Jason Birch]

+1 Jason

On 2010-08-10, Greg Boone <greg.boone at autodesk.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> If there are no further comments, I motion for a vote to accept "FDO RFC 51
> - Update WFS provider to support 1.1.0."
> (http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc51)
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
>
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:29 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Please review FDO RFC 51 - Update WFS provider
> to support 1.1.0
>
> One last call for feedback, if no further feedback is forthcoming, I will
> call for a vote tomorrow.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Leo Dai
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 5:45 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Please review FDO RFC 51 - Update WFS provider
> to support 1.1.0
>
> Any comments on it?
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Leo Dai
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:02 PM
> To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [fdo-internals] Please review FDO RFC 51 - Update WFS provider to
> support 1.1.0
>
> All,
>
> FDO RFC 51 - Update WFS provider to support 1.1.0 is ready for review. Can
> you review it?
> http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc51
>
> Thanks,
> Leo Dai
>
>