[fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.6 Release Candidate and Branching

[Greg Boone]

I believe it was tried by several developers in the 3.5 timeframe and seemed to work fine.

Unfortunately I do not have access to a 64bit Linux OS I could use to release a 3.6 distribution. I would be willing to try and coordinate with a developer who does.

Greg

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:41 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Cc: FDO Users Mail List (fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org)
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.6 Release Candidate and Branching

Hi Greg,

I'm curious to know if anyone has  tried 64 bit compilation and gcc 4.4 compilation of FDO on Linux.  MapGuide currently has 64 bit support for Windows but not for Linux.  And it would be good get to MapGuide and FDO compiling on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS which uses gcc 4.4.

Regards,
Trevor

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: January 26, 2011 2:05 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List (fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org)
Cc: FDO Users Mail List (fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org)
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.6 Release Candidate and Branching

Hi All,

It is getting to that time of year that we typically branch FDO in preparation for a full FDO release (3.6), allowing the trunk to continue on as a fully-open development environment leading towards the next iteration of FDO, namely 3.7.

In conjunction with that happening, I was thinking to post an official Release Candidate of FDO and create a 3.6 branch under:

https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo/branches/3.6

Are there any concerns with branching FDO at this time or releasing a candidate build?

Regards,
Greg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20110127/e39de7f7/attachment.html