[fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.7 beta2 timeframe

[Trevor Wekel]

Ok.  Thanks Greg.  I will chat more with Jackie offline about the Linux builds.  The .sh file build should generate an FDO image with the same third party components as the Windows version.

The cmake build may generate a build which uses more of the distro's third party components.  This may not be identical to the Windows image but could be more acceptable from a packaging perspective.  For example, building our own version of OpenSSL is considered a "no-no" from a packaging perspective.

Regards,
Trevor

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: April 24, 2012 9:57 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.7 beta2 timeframe

If you both can look into the Linux SDKs I can take care of the windows side, as well as the source distributions. For Linux, a 64bit distribution would be a good idea. You can use either the .sh files or cmake for the build.

Greg

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 11:53 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.7 beta2 timeframe

Sounds good to me.  Did you want Jackie and I to start working on open source builds/SDKs?  I do not have licenses in place for ESRI but I recall that someone was able to build the ESRI-based providers from the SDK I created last time around.  Is that approach still acceptable?

Do we want to take a run at CentOS 5 64 bit for this release to see how close we are?

Also, are the official builds to be built with build_linux.sh and build_thirdparty.sh?  I believe Jackie was looking into the cmake process for Ubuntu.

Regards,
Trevor

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org]<mailto:[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org]> On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: April 24, 2012 9:11 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.7 beta2 timeframe

We need to move to RC1. I don't see the need for a Beta2.

Greg

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 12:16 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.7 beta2 timeframe

Hi list,

Just pinging again.  Do we also want to take a run at a 64 bit Linux build on centos5 for beta2?

Since beta1 was posted on December 2, 2011 the timing may be appropriate for beta2 and a ramp up to RC and Release.

Regards,
Trevor

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org]<mailto:[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org]> On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: April 19, 2012 10:31 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.7 beta2 timeframe

Hello list,

Do we want do a beta2 for FDO which includes GDAL 1.9?  beta1 was created just before the GDAL upgrade.  I may be able to spend some time building the SDKs next week if needed.

Regards,
Trevor

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20120424/dfd77358/attachment.html