[fdo-internals] RFC 67 - Migrate FDO to VS 2012 -- MOTION to ACCEPT

[Greg Boone]

Hi All,

I motion that the RFC be accepted.

+1.

Greg

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Haris Kurtagic
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 5:22 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] RFC 67 - Migrate FDO to VS 2012

Hi Greg,
Ok, I understand. We leave that for another RFC then.

Haris

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Greg Boone <greg.boone at autodesk.com<mailto:greg.boone at autodesk.com>> wrote:
Hi Haris,

We could do this, but this would be a change for the Autodesk install and the various open source build scripts. I would like to see this proposed and scheduled separately from the VS2012 RFC so we can easily divide the effort and schedule it accordingly.

Greg

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>] On Behalf Of Haris Kurtagic
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 6:36 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List

Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] RFC 67 - Migrate FDO to VS 2012

Hi Karsten,

I would really like that we add $(Configuration) and &(PlatformToolset) into FDO project's properties output and intermeddiate directory propeties (and lib ).
Currently we have like 'Obj\Fdo\Win32\Debug\' . That would be changed to something like : Obj\$(PlatformToolset)\Fdo\Win32\$(Configuration)\
I personally like to use $(Platform) instead of Win32 or x64.

I think this will be very useful important because we can easier add new configurations for previous compilers. I currently need to make copies of whole fdo folders and rename to create builds for vs9 and vs10.

If some help or testing would be needed to fulfill this additional req., I am happy to jump in.

Thanks,
Haris


On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jackie Ng <jumpinjackie at gmail.com<mailto:jumpinjackie at gmail.com>> wrote:
Is the milestone of 3.8.1 correct?

Is this not a breaking change for a point release?

- Jackie



--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/RFC-67-Migrate-FDO-to-VS-2012-tp5057677p5057714.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals


_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20130614/6ee83618/attachment.html>