[fdo-internals] Please review RFC 66
greg.boone at autodesk.com
Wed May 1 06:32:05 PDT 2013
I believe the intent was just to address the new API methods outlined in this RFC, not other aspects of the FDO API. This pattern has been (should be) used/implemented on an as-needed basis.
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jackie Ng
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 1:34 AM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] Please review RFC 66
How far do you folks want to actually take this?
Just to address this particular API in this RFC or APIs throughout the FDO .net API where it is desirable to be able to pass in a fully managed .net interface implementation to certain methods in the FDO .net API?
This could have far reaching implications (mainly positive ones) on the .net side
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Please-review-RFC-66-tp5048641p5050575.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the fdo-internals