[fdo-internals] RFC 68 for review
Greg Boone
greg.boone at autodesk.com
Wed Sep 11 07:46:42 PDT 2013
In general I have no issues with the goals of the RFC.
Some initial feedback on the patch. I will do a deeper review and get back to you.
(a) What is the difference between the following 2 functions? They seem duplicates of each other. SupportsAnsiQuotes() is never used.
Index: Providers/GenericRdbms/Src/PostGis/SchemaMgr/Ph/Mgr.cpp
===================================================================
--- Providers/GenericRdbms/Src/PostGis/SchemaMgr/Ph/Mgr.cpp (revision 6964)
+++ Providers/GenericRdbms/Src/PostGis/SchemaMgr/Ph/Mgr.cpp (working copy)
bool FdoSmPhPostGisMgr::SupportsAnsiQuotes()
{
if(mIsCaseSensitive)
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
bool FdoSmPhPostGisMgr::IsCaseSensitive()
{
return mIsCaseSensitive;
}
(b) Why did you remove the use of GIST_GEOMETRY_OPS below?
Index: Providers/GenericRdbms/Src/PostGis/SchemaMgr/Ph/SpatialIndex.cpp
===================================================================
--- Providers/GenericRdbms/Src/PostGis/SchemaMgr/Ph/SpatialIndex.cpp (revision 6964)
+++ Providers/GenericRdbms/Src/PostGis/SchemaMgr/Ph/SpatialIndex.cpp (working copy)
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
indexName = indexName.Right(L"."); // no schema
sqlStmt = FdoStringP::Format(
- L"CREATE INDEX \"%ls\" ON %ls USING GIST (\"%ls\" GIST_GEOMETRY_OPS)",
+ L"CREATE INDEX \"%ls\" ON %ls USING GIST (\"%ls\")",
(FdoString*) indexName,
(FdoString*) tableDbQName, // no dbo. prefix etc.
column->GetName()
(c) Can you update your indent/tab to be 4 spaces? That is the expected standard. Also. all tab characters should be replaced by 4 spaces.
(d) I believe you have a memory leak. New and no subsequent delete.
Index: Providers/GenericRdbms/Src/PostGis/Fdo/FdoRdbmsPostGisConnectionInfo.cpp
===================================================================
--- Providers/GenericRdbms/Src/PostGis/Fdo/FdoRdbmsPostGisConnectionInfo.cpp (revision 6964)
+++ Providers/GenericRdbms/Src/PostGis/Fdo/FdoRdbmsPostGisConnectionInfo.cpp (working copy)
@@ -92,6 +92,16 @@
NlsMsgGet(FDORDBMS_117, "DataStore"), L"",
false, false, true, false, false, true, false, 0, NULL);
mPropertyDictionary->AddProperty(pProp);
+
+ wchar_t **boolValues = new wchar_t*[2];
+ boolValues[0] = new wchar_t[5];
+ boolValues[1] = new wchar_t[6];
+ wcscpy(boolValues[0], L"TRUE");
+ wcscpy(boolValues[1], L"FALSE");
+ pProp = new ConnectionProperty (FDO_RDBMS_CONNECTION_CASESENSITIVE, L"CaseSensitive", L"TRUE", false, false, true, false, false, false, false, 2, (const wchar_t**)boolValues);
+
+
+ mPropertyDictionary->AddProperty(pProp);
}
Regards,
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bruno Scott
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:54 AM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [fdo-internals] RFC 68 for review
Hi all,
RFC 68 (http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc68) has been posted. It proposes to add case insensitive support to the PostgreSQL provider
Bruno Scott
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/RFC-68-for-review-tp5077290.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
More information about the fdo-internals
mailing list