[fdo-users] Requests for the FDO documents

[Hidekazu Shimaji]

Hi,

I've downloaded the new document, too.
It's a nice work.  Namespaces get clear, and it is much easier to use.

I have some points for feed-back.
In the introduction page, an image file "FDO_architecture.png" is not linked.
About the HTML help(not chm), the class tree in the left frame looks strange.

Hidekazu


--- Haris Kurtagic <haris at sl-king.com> wrote:

> I have downloaded and try it, it is great. 
> 
> Thank you,
> Haris
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: 5. marec 2007 23:35
> To: Hidekazu Shimaji; FDO Users ML
> Subject: RE: [fdo-users] Requests for the FDO documents
> 
> Hi Hidekazu,
> 
> The Managed and Unmanaged HTML documentation for the FDO 3.2.0 release
> can now be downloaded from:
> 
> http://fdo.osgeo.org/downloads.html
> 
> The exact link for the download is:
> 
> http://198.202.74.219/download/fdo/3.2.0/fdodocs-3.2.0.tar.gz
> 
> In addition, the online Managed API documentation now contains the
> namespace changes I mentioned yesterday.
> 
> http://fdo.osgeo.org/files/fdo/docs/FDO_API_managed/index.htm
> 
> Greg
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:55 PM
> To: Hidekazu Shimaji; FDO Users ML
> Subject: RE: [fdo-users] Requests for the FDO documents
> 
> Hi Hidekazu,
> 
> Thank you for your comments. We are working on your first request to add
> namespace information. Shortly, I will be updating the online
> documentation at http://fdo.osgeo.org/documentation.html to reflect
> these changes. When the upload is complete you will see that the
> namespace documentation has been improved but it is not perfect. 
> 
> We are currently using Doxygen to generate the managed API docs from the
> header file comments. While we have had fairly good success using this
> tool for the unmanaged API, we have encountered some difficulties in
> having the generated managed API documentation reflect our required
> content. I look forward to your continued feedback once the upload is
> complete. If you can recommend ho we can better leverage Doxygen, please
> let us know. We are open to all ideas.
> 
> As for your second and third points, I will look into this and try and
> see what is possible to do.
> 
> Greg
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Hidekazu Shimaji
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 3:19 AM
> To: FDO Users ML
> Subject: [fdo-users] Requests for the FDO documents
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have some requests for improving the FDO documents as a .NET
> developer.
> 
> 1.Please add a namespace descripton to each class. (Managed FDO API
> Reference)
> Namespaces are important for .net programers.
> 
> 2.Please add a description to the "Setup the Application Development
> Environment" 
> for C# or VB programes. (The Essential FDO)
> It is difficult for beginners to find "mgfdo.dll" to refer.
> 
> 3.Please make the FDO API Reference downloadable, or installable with
> the MapGuide.
> This makes us work efficiently.
> 
> I hope my opinions contributes to improving the documents.
> 
> Best regards,
> Hidekazu Shimaji
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-users mailing list
> fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-users mailing list
> fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-users mailing list
> fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
>