[fdo-users] Is there a fixed naming convention for FDO providers?
Jackie C. Ng
jumpinjackie at gmail.com
Fri Aug 29 02:10:38 EDT 2008
Disregard this question. It seems the provider name returned from IConnection
is version-less.
- Jackie
Jackie C. Ng wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Do all FDO provider names have to follow the
> [Organization].[Format].[Major Version].[Minor Version] format?
>
> What I am trying to do is work with the provider's name (without the
> version number part). There doesn't seem to be an API to get just the
> version-less name of an FDO provider. So I am currently just stripping off
> the version part of the string.
>
> Of course this assumes that the names of all FDO providers follow the same
> naming convention, hence the question above.
>
> - Jackie
>
-----
http://themapguyde.blogspot.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackieng
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-a-fixed-naming-convention-for-FDO-providers--tp19214054p19214224.html
Sent from the FDO Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the fdo-users
mailing list