[fdo-users] PostGIS : new feature class naming proposition

[Bruno Scott]

We are actively debugging the postgis provider.
And i have a proposal for the featureclass name

Actually , on the connection string we specify the datastore.
As this datastore is phycally the schema name so there is no need to include
it in the featureclass name

So i suggest to get rid of this schema name but to keep backward
compatibility

So if someone use an fdo function having a featureclass name as an input
parameters
both "schema~table" or "table" will work

but if we ask the provider to give us the list of featureclass name
it will only return "table"


Is that ok?

Bruno

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PostGIS-%3A-new-feature-class-naming-proposition-tp15430051s18162p15430051.html
Sent from the fdo-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.