[fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names

Greg Boone greg.boone at autodesk.com
Fri Feb 13 12:02:09 EST 2009


Maybe winzip barfed unpacking it. I took a look at the tar.gz file. It seems ok.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bob Cave
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 11:41 AM
To: fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names


I downloaded fdo-3.3.2.tar.gz yesterday, and unpacked it with WinZip 8.

Bob


Jason Birch wrote:
>
> That's bizarre...  It's almost like a truncated unix-based file
> permission string got appended to the filenames.  They appear properly
> in the tarball I looked in (http://download.osgeo.org/fdo/3.3.2/)
>
> What source are you using to build from?  I wonder if a broken SVN or
> tar utility messed up the filenames for you...
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Cave
> Sent: February-13-09 6:52 AM
> To: fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [fdo-users] 3.3.2 Source Files with Unexpected Names
>
> When I looked in the directories where those files were supposed to be,
> I
> found files with those names, but with a suffix of 0000644 (e.g.,
> XercesXPath.hpp0000644).
>
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-users mailing list
> fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/3.3.2-Source-Files-with-Unexpected-Names-tp2321595p2322218.html
Sent from the FDO Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users


More information about the fdo-users mailing list