[fdo-users] Re: new King.SpatiaLite FDO Provider

[Zac Spitzer]

Jason blogged about this which does explain things a bit further

http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2010/08/30/518/fdos-spatialite-support-goes-native/

quote:
"2. SpatiaLite takes SQLite‘s concept of database-in-a-file, and turns
it into geodatabase-in-a-file, offering a full
suite of geospatial query abilities in a lightweight extension to
SQLite. FDO already has a robust SQLite provider
that uses its own open geometry format, metadata, and spatial
functions. In contrast, SL-King‘s new provider
is intended for users who prefer to use the SpatiaLite geometry
format, and takes advantage of SpatiaLite’s built-in GIS
capabilities."

I think sdf3 also uses sqlite underneath, so that's three differing
implementations for FDO!

z


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Crispin_at_1Spatial
<crispin.hoult at 1spatial.com> wrote:
>
> Haris,
>
> Can you say how this is different from the implementation of the OSGeo
> SQLite provider?
>
> Is the FGF storage different to the Spatialite binary making the datasets
> not sharable?
>
>  - thanks
> --
> View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/new-King-SpatiaLite-FDO-Provider-tp5480448p5485900.html
> Sent from the FDO Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-users mailing list
> fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
>



-- 
Zac Spitzer
Solution Architect / Director
Ennoble Consultancy Australia
http://www.ennoble.com.au
http://zacster.blogspot.com
+61 405 847 168