[fdo-users] RE: FDO 3.6 Release Candidate and Branching

[Traian Stanev]

Hi Trevor,

I have used the SHP, OGR and SQlite providers on Linux/64. The only issues I had were with the SHP provider using incorrect alignment in some structures, but I fixed those when I found them. As far as building with the latest Gcc, it might require a minor amount of coaxing to get it to compile, but I don't expect it to be anything major.

Traian

P.S. I was using the CMake build and all third party components were the ones installed by apt-get rather than the ones that come with FDO itself. Since recently, this is no longer possible as Xalan 1.1 is not compatible with Xerces 3 as distributed by the Ubuntu repositories, while FDO no longer compiles with older the Xerces.


From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:41 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Cc: FDO Users Mail List (fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org)
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.6 Release Candidate and Branching

Hi Greg,

I'm curious to know if anyone has  tried 64 bit compilation and gcc 4.4 compilation of FDO on Linux.  MapGuide currently has 64 bit support for Windows but not for Linux.  And it would be good get to MapGuide and FDO compiling on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS which uses gcc 4.4.

Regards,
Trevor

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: January 26, 2011 2:05 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List (fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org)
Cc: FDO Users Mail List (fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org)
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.6 Release Candidate and Branching

Hi All,

It is getting to that time of year that we typically branch FDO in preparation for a full FDO release (3.6), allowing the trunk to continue on as a fully-open development environment leading towards the next iteration of FDO, namely 3.7.

In conjunction with that happening, I was thinking to post an official Release Candidate of FDO and create a 3.6 branch under:

https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo/branches/3.6

Are there any concerns with branching FDO at this time or releasing a candidate build?

Regards,
Greg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-users/attachments/20110127/622d7542/attachment.html