[Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function

[Greg Boone]

I am not sure what the concern here is. There is no foreseen limitations
on submissions to the trunks of any of our providers. The only
limitations would be to branches that will be used to support the
upcoming Hammerhead and Bond releases of Map products.

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Badreddine Karoui
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 9:09 AM
To: Mateusz Loskot; fdo_dev
Subject: RE: [Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function

We've been committing code for over a week into the 3.2.x branch. As far
as I know everything is ok.

How often you need to change code that is not specific to PostGIS
provider? This particular change seems to be a no-op as far as the other
providers and I'm wondering if this is an isolated an rare event, it
should probably be merged sooner than later into the main branches. We
don't want to end up at one point in the future not being able to
integrate the PostGIS provider because we would not be allowed to make
such a change to other providers.

Badreddine

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:19 PM
To: fdo_dev
Subject: Re: [Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function

Greg, Badreddine,

Yes, that's perfectly clear to me that I'm working on my
private branch now, so all changes on other components than PostGIS
provider go there too and should be reviewed.

Also, I've not yet started to use the new FDO repositories after the
migration, as I'd prefer to wait until everything works well.
Do you recommend to start committing now (to my private branch) ?

Mat

Greg Boone wrote:
> Any changes would have to go into the PostGIS branch only. Once the
> change has been reviewed it can be integrated into the GenericRDBMS
> trunk. This change should not be integrated into the 3.2.x branch.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Badreddine
Karoui
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:32 PM
> To: fdo_dev
> Subject: RE: [Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function
> 
> Go ahead. But can you hold off changing subversion until tomorrow?
> 
> Badreddine
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:17 PM
> To: fdo_dev
> Subject: Re: [Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function
> 
> Badreddine Karoui wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>  The GDBI/RDBI interface is not cast in stone. Option 1 seems the
>> reasonable solution to me.
>> MySql driver just have to be fixed up in this
>> case and no need for the kludge of option 2.
> 
> OK, so I'm waiting for answer on my question who is going to fix it.
> I can do it too.
> 
> Cheers


-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________
Fdo_dev mailing list
Fdo_dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo_dev

_______________________________________________
Fdo_dev mailing list
Fdo_dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo_dev