[FOSS-GPS] rtklib: simple DGPS post-processing experiment
Tomoji Takasu
ttaka at yk.rim.or.jp
Fri Jul 23 13:08:06 EDT 2010
Dear Timo
> 1) Is it normal that neo1-neo2.pos has 1380 points while both neo1.pos
> and neo2.pos have over 7200 points?
> 2) Did this really improve anything? ;-) Since the number of points is
> different I am not quite sure how to interpret the scatter plots.
No.
Most of solutions are rejected by validation because of large noises.
Add -x 2 options and see warning in *.trace file.
To output full solutions, you have to tune error parameters
according to your environment but RNX2RTKP 2.3.0 can
not tune error parameters. Try RTKPOST or RNX2RTKP 2.4.0
released soon.
Large multipath might much degrades solutions. I recommend
you had better use good antennas.
regards,
Tomoji TAKASU
WWW: http://gpspp.sakura.ne.jp
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Timo Juhani Lindfors" <timo.lindfors at iki.fi>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:16 AM
To: <foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org>
Cc: <ttaka at yk.rim.or.jp>
Subject: [FOSS-GPS] rtklib: simple DGPS post-processing experiment
> Hello Tomoji,
>
> as promised, here's a report of my attempts to use rtklib for
> post-processing.
>
> Hardware setup
> ==============
>
> 1) neo1 is an openmoko gta02V5.
> 2) neo2 is an openmoko gta02V7.
> 3) Both devices are outside on a wooden table.
> 4) The LCD of each device faces downwards.
> 5) The "up" direction of each device points to South-East.
> 6) Distance between the devices is one meter (give or take a few
> centimeters).
> 7) neo2 is North-East of neo1.
>
> Captured data
> =============
>
> http://iki.fi/lindi/gps/experiment/1/neo1.ubx
> http://iki.fi/lindi/gps/experiment/1/neo2.ubx
>
> Post-processing steps
> =====================
>
> $ rtklib-convbin neo1.ubx
> $ rtklib-convbin neo2.ubx
> $ rtklib-rnx2rtkp -p 1 -l 60.217480929 24.393206102 71.2617 neo1.obs
> neo2.obs neo1.nav > neo1-neo2.pos
> $ head -n20 neo1-neo2.pos
> % program : rnx2rtkp ver.2.3.0
> % inp file : neo1.obs
> % inp file : neo2.obs
> % inp file : neo2.nav
> % obs start : 2010/07/22 06:25:13.0 GPST (week1593 368713.0s)
> % obs end : 2010/07/22 08:29:45.0 GPST (week1593 376185.0s)
> % ref pos : 60.217480929 24.393206102 71.2617
> %
> % (lat/lon/height=WGS84/ellipsoidal,Q=1:fix,2:float,4:dgps,5:single,ns=#
> of satellites)
> % GPST latitude(deg) longitude(deg) height(m) Q ns
> sdn(m) sde(m) sdu(m) sdne(m) sdeu(m) sdun(m) age(s) ratio
> 2010/07/22 06:29:01.998 60.217692722 24.393138007 61.6161 4 4
> 2.3673 0.9796 2.9740 -1.1745 -1.0261 -0.5434 0.00 0.0
> 2010/07/22 06:29:02.998 60.217716772 24.393110643 65.7936 4 4
> 2.3680 0.9798 2.9741 -1.1751 -1.0262 -0.5407 0.00 0.0
> 2010/07/22 06:29:03.998 60.217727627 24.393090583 69.9502 4 4
> 2.3688 0.9801 2.9742 -1.1758 -1.0263 -0.5379 0.00 0.0
> 2010/07/22 06:29:04.998 60.217727239 24.393083772 73.7900 4 4
> 2.3695 0.9803 2.9744 -1.1764 -1.0265 -0.5352 0.00 0.0
> 2010/07/22 06:29:05.998 60.217700360 24.393116329 72.5172 4 4
> 2.3702 0.9805 2.9745 -1.1770 -1.0266 -0.5324 0.00 0.0
> 2010/07/22 06:29:06.998 60.217646591 24.393137804 75.9859 4 4
> 2.3709 0.9807 2.9747 -1.1776 -1.0267 -0.5296 0.00 0.0
> 2010/07/22 06:29:07.998 60.217605988 24.393149454 77.8729 4 4
> 2.3717 0.9809 2.9748 -1.1783 -1.0269 -0.5268 0.00 0.0
> 2010/07/22 06:29:08.998 60.217573994 24.393164286 76.2576 4 4
> 2.3724 0.9812 2.9750 -1.1789 -1.0270 -0.5240 0.00 0.0
> 2010/07/22 06:29:09.998 60.217562704 24.393172695 76.4654 4 4
> 2.3731 0.9814 2.9751 -1.1795 -1.0271 -0.5212 0.00 0.0
> 2010/07/22 06:29:10.998 60.217558401 24.393176600 73.0197 4 4
> 2.3738 0.9816 2.9752 -1.1802 -1.0272 -0.5183 0.00 0.0
>
> Evaluation
> ==========
>
> Scatter plots of neo1.pos, neo2.pos and neo1-neo2.pos are at
>
> http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/gps/experiment/1/scatter.html
>
> Histograms of distance to average (simple sqrt((lat-lat_avg)**2 +
> (lon-lon_avg)**2)) are at
>
> http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/gps/experiment/1/histo.html
>
> Open questions
> ==============
>
> 1) Is it normal that neo1-neo2.pos has 1380 points while both neo1.pos
> and neo2.pos have over 7200 points?
>
> 2) Did this really improve anything? ;-) Since the number of points is
> different I am not quite sure how to interpret the scatter plots.
>
> -Timo
> _______________________________________________
> This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS at lists.osgeo.org mailing list.
> Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your
> subscription
> For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
>
>
>
More information about the FOSS-GPS
mailing list