[FOSS-GPS] FOSS-GPS Digest, Vol 80, Issue 3
arwooldridge
arwooldridge at googlemail.com
Tue Sep 1 13:22:56 PDT 2015
Simon,
Try using anti vibration mounts.
I too have seen the effect of a sharp tap on the ublox earlier units.
Regards
Anthony Wooldridge
On 01/09/2015 21:03, Felipe G. Nievinski wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:05:25 +0200
> From: Simon Treny <simon.treny at gmail.com
> <mailto:simon.treny at gmail.com>>
> To: Open Source GPS-related discussion and support
> <foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org>>
> Subject: [FOSS-GPS] Shocks/vibrations on antenna and cycle slips
> Message-ID: <C764E181-99B8-4B0F-9FB0-858E3684456B at gmail.com
> <mailto:C764E181-99B8-4B0F-9FB0-858E3684456B at gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm using RTKLib to perform RTK positioning using UBlox M8T
> evaluation-kits (EVK). I have great results when the GPS antenna
> is attached on the rooftop of a car driving on a track (accuracy
> <10cm).
> But as soon as a I attach the EVK and the antenna on a quad bike
> and drive on a bumpy road, the accuracy becomes really bad (the
> distance between 2 antennas can be off by >3 meters).
> In both cases, I have a clear view of the sky and no tree or
> building around.
>
> By looking at the recordings with RTKPlot, I've noticed that I get
> much more losses of lock when the antenna is on the
> quad-bike/bumpy-road rather than on the car/track. My guess is
> that the shocks caused by driving on the bumpy-road causes these
> losses of lock. I've measured with the accelerometer of my phone
> the acceleration on both the car and the quad-bike: on the car,
> the vertical acceleration never goes beyond 3g, while the vertical
> acceleration on the quad-bike can go up to 8g.
>
> I've reproduced this observation by attaching the antenna on a
> pole, and shaking the pole vertically. As soon as I shake it, many
> losses of lock occur.
> If I do the same by attaching the EVK on the pole and letting the
> antenna static on the ground, there is no loss of lock (excluding
> the possibility that it comes from the oscillator).
>
> Is this a known issue with low-cost receivers/antennas? Is there a
> way to improve the situation? Are there other low-cost receivers
> that support shocks or vibrations better than the UBlox M8T?
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
> The datashet says: "Operational limits: Dynamics ≤ 4 g"...
>
> <https://www.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/products/documents/NEO-LEA-M8T_DataSheet_(UBX-14006196).pdf
> <https://www.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/products/documents/NEO-LEA-M8T_DataSheet_%28UBX-14006196%29.pdf>>
>
> -F.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS at lists.osgeo.org mailing list.
> Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription
> For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20150901/1b09cf1c/attachment.html>
More information about the FOSS-GPS
mailing list