[FOSS4G-Oceania] Fwd: [OSGeo-Conf] TGP's in 2019
Cameron Shorter
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 12:04:48 PST 2019
Re where the TGP sits:
* I expect people involved in the TGP will likely have a foot in both
the LOC and Board, so for this round, it won't matter much who makes the
final call.
* As we have all noticed, the LOC has a significant amount of work to
do. The more non-core tasks that can be out-sourced to external
sub-committees, the better. (This also allows for external expertise to
be developed between years and carried over between conferences.)
* I see core tasks as being tasks which are bound to the physical
location, and probably also the financial success.
* For everything else, I'd err on suggesting that we try to source a
leader from outside of the core LOC.
On 9/2/19 10:16 pm, adam steer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> …as always, I’m happy to help on the Mojo/TGP front, and I’d like to
> hear Daniel chime in here - there may be visions/plans afoot in the
> LOC already, and in the OSGeo TGP funding sense the LOC must be the
> primary drivers (see the cookbook referenced here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kzu9z_4BRMzCc5y9SsE7--GnShL30kPGnh7gXlqJspQ
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kzu9z_4BRMzCc5y9SsE7--GnShL30kPGnh7gXlqJspQ/edit>).
> While it might seem onerous/inflexible, OSGeo aims to make sure that
> TGP money is used for one thing only - getting people to conferences.
>
> It seems natural for ‘Good Mojo’ contributions to be managed by OSGeo
> Oceania, and delivered to conference LOCs per their requests for
> TGP/inclusivity measures - more or less how TGPs work in OSGeo,
> actually. However, I’m not certain we’ve had that conversation yet and
> this may be pre-empting discussion.
>
> Wider outreach/travel funding is a separate issue, and needs to be
> discussed in the context of funding the organisation more generally.
>
> So yes, we need to move - but not rush. I apologise if my overly-brief
> note indicated a need to act immediately-as-in-right-now-on-a-weekend.
>
> Cheers
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 21:47, Greg Lauer <gregory.lauer at gmail.com
> <mailto:gregory.lauer at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I think that the TGP is far wider than just the annual conference,
> and thus should be coordinated/managed at board level. As well as
> funding travel to the annual conference I think there is scope to
> make funds available for travel to other related conferences,
> training (inbound and outbound), and any other initiatives that
> meets the vision of OSGeo Oceania. Maybe this is a Working Group
> or a sub-committee role. I see funding coming from multiple
> sources such as AID agencies, commercial entities and other
> associations (SSSI for example). It may be that we set up a
> separate TGP for each conference/event but the funding/governance
> is coordinated at a much wider level,
>
> The above said I think it is important to 'strike while the iron
> is hot', and follow up on the FOSS GIS funding opportunity ASAP. I
> am happy to assist Jonah in putting together the application.
>
> Cheers
>
> Greg
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 6:16 PM John Bryant <johnwbryant at gmail.com
> <mailto:johnwbryant at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'd see this as sitting with the conference committee, if that
> group is willing and able to take it on. Of course, the CC
> hasn't actually formed yet, but perhaps this can be on the
> agenda for the first meeting? The Letter of Intent
> specifically references a TGP so it seems likely to be
> considered a priority.
>
> I'd also see the need for the CC to pull together at least a
> first draft of a budget before we can really estimate what our
> TGP can look like, financially.
>
> And as an update, relevant to budget discussions, we're
> currently waiting on the SSSI board to agree with our request
> to carry forward the outstanding balance ($8700) of the Good
> Mojo Fund. I believe it will be on the agenda for their next
> board meeting, within next couple of weeks I think (Kerry?).
>
> Cheers
> John
>
> On Sat., 9 Feb. 2019, 3:03 pm adam steer,
> <adam.d.steer at gmail.com <mailto:adam.d.steer at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hey Jonah - great! Just make sure it's coordinated with
> the board and in particular the conference loc.
>
> On that front, where do people think tgp coordination sits
> - with the osgeo Oceania board, or with conference
> committees?
>
> I think the conference loc, because they're the
> operational unit and have responsibility to execute/manage
> tgp with respect to each conference (which will be
> different each time).
>
> Cheers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FOSS4G-Oceania mailing list
> FOSS4G-Oceania at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:FOSS4G-Oceania at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g-oceania
>
> _______________________________________________
> FOSS4G-Oceania mailing list
> FOSS4G-Oceania at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:FOSS4G-Oceania at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g-oceania
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Adam Steer
> http://spatialised.net
> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Adam_Steer
> http://au.linkedin.com/in/adamsteer
> http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0046-7236
> +61 427 091 712
> skype: adam.d.steer
> tweet: @adamdsteer
>
> _______________________________________________
> FOSS4G-Oceania mailing list
> FOSS4G-Oceania at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g-oceania
--
Cameron Shorter
Technology Demystifier
Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant
M +61 (0) 419 142 254
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g-oceania/attachments/20190210/18d51152/attachment.html>
More information about the FOSS4G-Oceania
mailing list