[Foss4g2009] Voting bias

[Venka]

Venka wrote:
> Are we going to have a poster session at FOSS4G2009.
> I think it would be nice to have one and indicate the choice
> of selecting for poster session in the voters page.
Any feedback for my query about poster session at
FOSS4G2009?

Is there some plan for allocating exclusive time where participants
could visit exhibition booths. It would be great incentive for
exhibitors if there could be some exclusive time wherein participants
could discuss about with exhibitors about the product and services
offered. Overlap of technical presentation, labs, workshops, tutorial
with poster and exhibitors session could be avoided even it it
means reducing presentation time form 30 minutes to 20 minutes.

best regards

venka
> Venka
>
> Shoaib Burq wrote:
>> Volker can you confirm ?
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Paul Ramsey 
>> <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> I thought they were already. It's pretty much required. You also have
>>> to have a plan for how to interpret un-rated entries.
>>>
>>> P
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Shoaib Burq<saburq at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>    
>>>> Folks
>>>> Jason Birch just made a comment on twitter
>>>> http://twitter.com/jasonbirch/statuses/2208718815
>>>>
>>>> It's a good point - think it's a good idea to randomize the order of
>>>> abstracts?
>>>> Shoaib
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Foss4g2009 mailing list
>>>> Foss4g2009 at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2009
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       
>>
>>   
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foss4g2009 mailing list
>> Foss4g2009 at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2009
>>   
>
>