[Foss4g2010] OSM at FOSS4G 2010?

[Lorenzo Becchi]

+1 to Ivan approach

I don't think we are ready to manage everything from the FOSS4G LOC. there's
plenty of variables doing just one conference, I can't imagine doing two
:)


2009/10/14 Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>

> That seems like a very reasonable and straightforward approach :)
>
> P
>
> 2009/10/13 Iván Sánchez Ortega <ivan at sanchezortega.es>:
> > El Martes, 13 de Octubre de 2009, Paul Ramsey escribió:
> >> One non-trivial thing to work out is how joint admission and/or
> >> budgeting would work, in terms of pricing, sponsorships, shared venue
> >> costs, shared meal costs, etc, etc, etc.
> >
> > I was thinking about keeping everything separate. Some days (e.g. 4-5)
> would
> > be OSM-only, other days (6-7-8-9) would be OSGeo-only; keeping
> sponsorships
> > and venue costs separately. Joint stuff would be only some kind of
> ticket,
> > and the out-of-venue social events.
> >
> > Unless, of course, OSGeo-ers think it's better the other way around.
> >
> >
> > --
> > ----------------------------------
> > Iván Sánchez Ortega <ivan at sanchezortega.es>
> >
> > "Ley de Alzheimer de la programación: si lees un código que escribiste
> hace
> > más de dos semanas es como si lo vieras por primera vez"
> >                                                  -- Via Dan Hurvitz
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foss4g2010 mailing list
> > Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2010/attachments/20091014/452ce81e/attachment.html