[Benchmarking] Re: [Foss4g2010] Re: Starting preparation fortechnology comparison presentations

Thu Apr 29 18:07:22 EDT 2010

Cameron,

Yes. I can help work on that in conjunction with Oracle folks.

Michael Smith
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hanover, NH
Remote Sensing/GIS Center

On Apr 29, 2010, at 1:33 PM, "Cameron Shorter" <cameron.shorter at gmail.com 
 > wrote:

> Mike, and others from Oracle, that is excellent news.
>
> One thing that is likely to be developed for FOSS4G 2010 is a number  
> of
> cross-project comparisons, as per: http://www.spatialserver.net/osgis/
> and http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GIS_Desktop_Comparison
>
> I'm expecting to see a Database feature comparison table, which will  
> at
> least include PostGIS and Spatialite.
>
> It would be great to see Oracle Spatial included in such a table?
> Would Oracle be prepared to help populate the table and work with the
> people who create it?
>
> Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH wrote:
> > Oracle will officially participate in the WMS shootout.
> >
> > Oracle would also like to have Oracle GeoRaster as a raster format  
> in the
> > tests as a comparison to file based raster, etc for those wms's  
> that support
> > it.
> >
> > Oracle Mapviewer will support shapefile and Oracle Spatial vector  
> access. An
> > Oracle database is required (at this time) for metadata (rendering  
> info).
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > On 4/28/10 12:34 PM, "Jeff McKenna"  
> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH wrote:
> >>
> >>> For the shootout, how about 30 min for the presentation and 30  
> min for
> >>> discussion / questions? Everybody has their own "burning"  
> questions they
> >>> want to ask. And it promotes a good discussion.
> >>>
> >> I like that plan.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Also, I hope to confirm Oracle's participation in the WMS  
> shootout today.
> >>>
> >> Excellent, thanks Mike.
> >>
> >> -jeff
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> >> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Benchmarking mailing list
> > Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
> >
>
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter
> Geospatial Director
> Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
> Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
>
> Think Globally, Fix Locally
> Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
> http://www.lisasoft.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Benchmarking mailing list
> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
>
> x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from ERD- 
> ML3ERD.erd.ds.usace.army.mil ([134.164.38.65]) by ERD- 
> ML4ERD.erd.ds.usace.army.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);  
> Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:33:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/ 
> html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted- 
> printable Received: from eis-ml1itl.eis.ds.usace.army.mil ([140.194.245.33 
> ]) by ERD-ML3ERD.erd.ds.usace.army.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830 
> ); Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:33:11 -0500 Received: from  
> cmx2.usace.army.mil ([140.194.245.34]) by eis- 
> ml1itl.eis.ds.usace.army.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);  
> Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:33:01 -0500 Received: from gw1.usace.army.mil  
> ([140.194.153.1]) by cmx2.usace.army.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959 
> ); Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:33:01 -0500 Received: from lists.osgeo.org  
> ([66.223.95.242])  by gw1.usace.army.mil with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2010  
> 20:33:00 +0000 Received: from osgeo1.osgeo.org  
> (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by lists.osgeo.org (Postfix)  
> with ESMTP id 68717E01DAF; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:32:59 -0400 (EDT)  
> Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com (mail-ww0-f43.google.com  
> [74.125.82.43]) by lists.osgeo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id  
> E829EE00033; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:32:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by  
> wwd20 with SMTP id 20so364781wwd.16 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:32:56  
> -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.163.4 with SMTP id z4mr2236351wek. 
> 83.1272573175703; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:32:55 -0700 (PDT) Received:  
> from [192.168.0.101] (c122-106-189-82.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.189.82 
> ]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x1sm9652783wbx. 
> 1.2010.04.29.13.32.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 29  
> Apr 2010 13:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: X-IronPort-AV:  
> E=Sophos;i="4.52,297,1270425600"; d="scan'208";a="192510647" x- 
> originalarrivaltime: 29 Apr 2010 20:33:01.0921 (UTC) FILETIME= 
> [29D5C510:01CAE7DB] X-SBRS: 4.8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24  
> (X11/20100411) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;  
> d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime- 
> version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content- 
> transfer-encoding;b=h8kZI7x45jRaFN0/ICmddGOrRK/ 
> 9bAGLCDaalesS68MwCWNI3EG/qmWMyS1TCmH4LwI+jprYCKVN1Za/60nppuEZXVYCS 
> + 
> W8QVApQUoFrVRFzmpLirVlBmE5NRxAgW0tSkSk9OhcMQVEYBHrBvp2TVBDgisnfMFy98f3EFpAocIErrors 
> -To: benchmarking-bounces at lists.osgeo.org X-BeenThere: benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org 
>  X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: "Performance testing of OSGeo and  
> other web service engines." List-Post:  List-Archive: X-Original-To: benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org 
>  Delivered-To: benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org DKIM-Signature: v=1;  
> a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=domainkey- 
> signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime- 
> version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content- 
> transfer-encoding;bh ocyiyvgh3/f45kDEftiOHzPT9aaenKbf8Ez/ZduLs=;bíMC 
> CgqrSAaE7VeoeMyB1UXxOT81syVKP6PTk+pywLqVODMjxo8tZX2EFgv/oPP4RWBouBSg 
> HXkewY8YelbfDrtLFmRO6DQxrxiqYWDtVVwlT+UQGNvVPt2RhBierFW8281q9Ua82kcd 
> vol6hYHRz16tgzb3Z+XGfltgU9j4dGQX-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X 
> -IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: As8BAGOJ2UtC31/ylGdsb2JhbACQT4F/ij8IFQEB 
> AQEJCwgJEQQerj8FgXyFWS6ITgEBAwWFCwSGXg Content-class: urn:content-cl 
> asses:message Subject: Re: [Benchmarking] Re: [Foss4g2010] Re: Start 
> ing preparation fortechnology comparison presentations Date: Thu, 29 
>  Apr 2010 15:32:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4BD9ECEE.70401 at gmail.com> In-R 
> eply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Bench 
> marking] Re: [Foss4g2010] Re: Starting preparation fortechnology com 
> parison presentations Thread-Index: Acrn20oh41a+ENr6SZeGU/XMdE4LHg== 
>  References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , From:  
> "Cameron Shorter" Sender: To: "Performance testing of OSGeo and othe 
> r web service engines." Cc: "Jean Ihm" , "foss4g2010" , , Reply-To:  
> "Performance testing of OSGeo and other web service engines."
> Mike, and others from Oracle, that is excellent news.
>
> One thing that is likely to be developed for FOSS4G 2010 is a number  
> of
> cross-project comparisons, as per: http://www.spatialserver.net/osgis/
> and http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GIS_Desktop_Comparison
>
> I'm expecting to see a Database feature comparison table, which will  
> at
> least include PostGIS and Spatialite.
>
> It would be great to see Oracle Spatial included in such a table?
> Would Oracle be prepared to help populate the table and work with the
> people who create it?
>
> Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH wrote:
> > Oracle will officially participate in the WMS shootout.
> >
> > Oracle would also like to have Oracle GeoRaster as a raster format  
> in the
> > tests as a comparison to file based raster, etc for those wms's  
> that support
> > it.
> >
> > Oracle Mapviewer will support shapefile and Oracle Spatial vector  
> access. An
> > Oracle database is required (at this time) for metadata (rendering  
> info).
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > On 4/28/10 12:34 PM, "Jeff McKenna"  
> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH wrote:
> >>
> >>> For the shootout, how about 30 min for the presentation and 30  
> min for
> >>> discussion / questions? Everybody has their own "burning"  
> questions they
> >>> want to ask. And it promotes a good discussion.
> >>>
> >> I like that plan.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Also, I hope to confirm Oracle's participation in the WMS  
> shootout today.
> >>>
> >> Excellent, thanks Mike.
> >>
> >> -jeff
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> >> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Benchmarking mailing list
> > Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
> >
>
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter
> Geospatial Director
> Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
> Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
>
> Think Globally, Fix Locally
> Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
> http://www.lisasoft.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Benchmarking mailing list
> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2010/attachments/20100429/0f5fb43e/attachment-0001.html