[FOSS4G2016] R: Call for Papers for the Academic Track (draft) / Where publish this call?

[till.adams at fossgis.de]

Hi Guido, @others,

about your Pdf-idea: In general we decided to publish the CfP on the 
Website and link to it through the emails and press releases we are 
going to sent out.

As said earlier, I'd prefer a unique approach for CfP general, CfP AT 
and Cf Workshops here. From the website we additionally might link to a 
Pdf, if needed.
The above was the procedure at least for the general CfP in the past 
years.

BTW: What is more interesting to me: For the general CfP/CfW we are 
working on a general email distributor, for this we've started to 
register a special (normally not used) emailadress 
(till.adams at foss4g2016.org) on local chapter and OSGEO-project 
mailing-lists. I don't mind releasing the CfP AT under a different name 
and/or emailadress, but in we should avoid cross-postings from the same 
conference but for different calls. So my question is - where do you 
want to release the CfP AT?

One last thing: In order to integrate the AT-team more in the general 
plannings - there is a weekly IRC chat on thursday 17 p.m. (CET) on 
OSGeo's freenode-channel.
For this I invite one or two days in advance via the foss4g2016-mailing 
list - everybody is welcome ;-)


Till



Am 2016-01-11 12:44, schrieb Maria Antonia Brovelli:
> Good point!
> ;-)
> I agree. Not only open, also free.
> Maria
>
> Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung
>
>  -------- Messaggio originale --------
>  Da: Guido Stein <guido at guidostein.com>
>  Data: 11/01/2016 12:41 (GMT+01:00)
>  A: Franz-Josef Behr <franz-josef.behr at hft-stuttgart.de>,
> foss4g2016 at lists.osgeo.org
>  Cc: Pradeep AP <geo.pradeep at gmail.com>
>  Oggetto: Re: [FOSS4G2016] Call for Papers for the Academic Track
> (draft)
>
> Hey folks,
>
> the cfp looks good to me. You may want to unbold the "theme:".
>
> I recently sat through a Richard Stallman talk
> 
> (http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/20140407-geneva-tedx-talk-free-software-free-society
> [3]) and wonder if you should be more explicit about the free in
> FOSS4G. I think this is more of a LOC conversation, but in the cfp 
> you
> make lots of references to open source, but nothing about free and
> open source.
>
> In that vein, perhaps the cfp should be published as a pdf?
>
> -Guido
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 4:33 PM Franz-Josef Behr
> <franz-josef.behr at hft-stuttgart.de [4]> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Please find attached the draft CfP for the Academic Track!
>>
>> Any comments until Tuesday evening are welcome!
>>
>> Viele Grüße / Best regards
>>
>> Franz-Josef and Pradeep
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
>> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org [1]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016 [2]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] mailto:FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
> [2] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016
> [3]
> 
> http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/20140407-geneva-tedx-talk-free-software-free-society
> [4] mailto:franz-josef.behr at hft-stuttgart.de