[FOSS4G2016] fast reaction needed: Prolongation of Scientific Track Call until 28th of March?

[Steven Feldman]

Another option is to accept abstracts only at this stage with full papers being required in say 30 or 60 days
______
Steven


> On 21 Mar 2016, at 14:54, till.adams at fossgis.de wrote:
> 
> just FYI:
> 
> in fetch ahead of our later IRC, scientific committee, Volker and me agreed, that we can dare to prolong the Call for Scientific Track (and only this!) for another week.
> Just twittered that.
> 
> Rest looks fine: >190 Proposals and ~ 40 workshops
> 
> Till
> 
> 
> -------- Originalnachricht --------
> Betreff: Re: fast reaction needed: Prolongation of Scientific Track Call until 28th of March?
> Datum: 2016-03-21 14:01
> Absender: Franz-Josef Behr <franz-josef.behr at hft-stuttgart.de>
> Empfänger: <till.adams at fossgis.de>, Pradeep <geo.pradeep at gmail.com>
> 
> I agree (as written before).
> 
> Best regards - Franz-Josef
> 
> Am 21.03.2016 um 13:03 schrieb till.adams at fossgis.de:
>> Dear Franz-Josef, Pradeep
>> 
>> knowing that especially Franz-Josef has a busy day today, I nevertheless would like to have a short answer ASAP.
>> 
>> If okay for you, we could prolong the Call for the Scientific Track for one week. That'll mean we onlx close the regular call today and keep the call for scientific track open until March 28th. Please drop us a note, then we could twitter this today.
>> 
>> Till
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016