[FOSS4G2016] [Program] Help putting talks into sessions

[Volker Mische]

Hi Program-Committee,

I've put half the talks into sessions now. It's getting harder and
harder and slowly it is also touching topics I'm not that much informed
about. So please help.

Cheers,
  Volker


On 05/15/2016 07:18 PM, Volker Mische wrote:
> Hi Program-Committee,
> 
> you can get started with putting things into sessions now. I've added
> the talks from the academic track to the "current" table.
> 
> The don't have any group yet, so feel free to add those if you read the
> abstract, to make the final session making easier.
> 
> Cheers,
>   Volker
> 
> 
> On 05/13/2016 05:27 PM, Volker Mische wrote:
>> Hi Program-Committee,
>>
>> I was sending out this email too early. We should wait until we have the
>> list of the accepted talks for the academic trac, as we'd like to
>> intermix them with the general track, and that's easier if we already
>> blur the line within the spreadsheet.
>>
>> I'll send out an email once the talks from the academic track are also
>> in the spreadsheet (probably on Monday).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Volker
>>
>>
>> On 05/13/2016 04:05 PM, Volker Mische wrote:
>>> Hi Program-Committee,
>>>
>>> once more it would be great to get some help. It's time to schedule the
>>> final program. I've updated the spreadsheet, there's now a sheet called
>>> "final". That's the table I'll import into Frab for the final scheduling.
>>>
>>> One task left is to put them into sessions. Please help grouping talks
>>> into session in the "final" spreadsheet. Each session has 3 slots.
>>> Please note that we also have 7 sessons with 2 slots. But I would target
>>> to schedule sessions with 3 slots each. We will surely have a few
>>> left-overs that we then can schedule into the smaller sessions.
>>>
>>> So just go through the talks and whenever you find 3 that fit together,
>>> come up with some name for a session and put it into that column. It is
>>> of course also OK to have several sessions (with 3 talks each) with the
>>> same name. Though the more specific the better, e.g. "OpenLayers for
>>> power users", "point clouds on mobile" or "remote sensing across poles".
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>   Volker
>>>