[fusion-dev] contributors agreements ??
Julien-Samuel Lacroix
jlacroix at mapgears.com
Wed May 14 16:19:07 EDT 2008
As long as the new contributor email the list that he have read and
understood the contributor agreement it's fine for me...as long as we
have a contributor agreement. I think the major headache we had (still
have?) with MapServer incubation was to track down everyone and ask to
give the ownership of the code.
I may have missed it, but the current MapServer committer guidelines
(RFC7) doesn't specify who own the code. GDAL Commiter Guildlines
address this with the Legal section I think. We should think of adding it.
OpenLayers:
http://trac.openlayers.org/wiki/HowToContribute
MapServer:
http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-7
GDAL:
http://www.gdal.org/rfc3_commiters.html
my 0.02$
Julien
Paul Spencer wrote:
> Given that one of our goals is eventual incubation into OSGeo, I would
> like to be well prepared for the incubation process. The most
> difficult part of that process for existing projects seems to be the
> code provenance review (where did all the code come from and do you
> clearly have the right to include it in your project).
>
> At this point in time, all the code in Fusion is copyright either DM
> Solutions Group or MapGears (thanks Alan!). As we are starting to get
> more traffic on the lists, it is conceivable that we will start getting
> bug fixes, patches, and new features contributed from outside DM
> Solutions Group. I would like to encourage this as much as possible,
> while maintaining clear entitlement to use the code that is contributed.
>
> There are two models in use right now in the projects that I am
> involved in.
>
> One is to require a signed contributors agreement for anyone that
> submits code (committer or not). Patches, features etc coming from
> anyone who has not signed a contributors agreement are not included.
> OpenLayers uses this model.
>
> The other is to have a committers agreement, whereby committers take
> responsibility for the code they are committing to the repository.
> They can accept user contributions and commit them if they feel the
> contribution is sound. MapServer uses this model.
>
> On the other axis is whether or not to require a signed agreement
> (OpenLayers) or just an acknowledgement of the agreement (MapServer).
>
> I'm open on both issues, I would like to get feedback from the (now
> growing) community of developers. But I would like to put something in
> place before we start getting a lot of contributions so we can prevent
> some of the leg work required for incubation.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> __________________________________________
>
> Paul Spencer
> Chief Technology Officer
> DM Solutions Group Inc
> http://www.dmsolutions.ca/
>
> _______________________________________________
> fusion-dev mailing list
> fusion-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fusion-dev
>
--
Julien-Samuel Lacroix
Mapgears
http://www.mapgears.com/
More information about the fusion-dev
mailing list