[Gdal-dev] Visual Studio 2005, GDAL and Manifests

[Simon Perkins]

Simon Perkins wrote:
> Yes, I see that the naming convention idea does help significantly 
> here. One question: do you build GDAL and then manually copy the DLLs 
> from the release or debug directories (as appropriate) into a common 
> directory that is on your PATH? Or do you modify the GDAL build 
> configurations so that both debug and release versions get built in 
> the same directory, and then put _that_ on your path (if that is even 
> possible)? I'm just trying to automate as much as possible...

Or do you put both debug and release build directories on your PATH?

Sy