[gdal-dev] Re: HDF-EOS vs. GDAL: order of dimensions
Andrey Kiselev
dron at ak4719.spb.edu
Wed Dec 19 13:34:23 EST 2007
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:59:55PM +0600, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> However, are there any reasons to actually disallow options to
> be specified in the (sub)dataset name?
I think this way is counter-intuitive and error-prone:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2007-November/014853.html
> Indeed, I've been thinking about a kind of ``helper files''
> (though a somewhat different kind) to allow for specified
> datasets to be ``stacked upon each other along the band axis'',
> forming a dataset with the same spatial dimensions and a larger
> bands number...
>
> BTW, setting GCPs and specifying the projection fits quite
> neatly into the ``helper file'' framework. I'm sure there are
> many other applications for them.
Actually it can be done with help of VRT datasets.
Best regards,
Andrey
--
Andrey V. Kiselev
ICQ# 26871517
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list