[Gdal-dev] Re: [Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function

[Mateusz Loskot]

Greg, Badreddine,

Yes, that's perfectly clear to me that I'm working on my
private branch now, so all changes on other components than PostGIS
provider go there too and should be reviewed.

Also, I've not yet started to use the new FDO repositories after the
migration, as I'd prefer to wait until everything works well.
Do you recommend to start committing now (to my private branch) ?

Mat



Greg Boone wrote:
> Any changes would have to go into the PostGIS branch only. Once the
> change has been reviewed it can be integrated into the GenericRDBMS
> trunk. This change should not be integrated into the 3.2.x branch.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Badreddine Karoui
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:32 PM
> To: fdo_dev
> Subject: RE: [Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function
> 
> Go ahead. But can you hold off changing subversion until tomorrow?
> 
> Badreddine
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:17 PM
> To: fdo_dev
> Subject: Re: [Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function
> 
> Badreddine Karoui wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>  The GDBI/RDBI interface is not cast in stone. Option 1 seems the
>> reasonable solution to me.
>> MySql driver just have to be fixed up in this
>> case and no need for the kludge of option 2.
> 
> OK, so I'm waiting for answer on my question who is going to fix it.
> I can do it too.
> 
> Cheers


-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net