[Gdal-dev] Re: C# Geometry Classes?
mateusz at loskot.net
Thu Mar 22 14:21:13 EDT 2007
Tamas Szekeres wrote:
> Sooner or later we should harmonize the C++ and the SWIG API or
> support a separate documentation for the SWIG interface. Otherwise
> the user will always search for specific methods described at the C++
> documentation but missing from the SWIG interface.
IMO, we should extend the existing documentation.
I believe it's time to document GDAL/OGR API in more generic way,
and for every C API function, there should be a reference or note about
equivalent of that function in SWIG bingings.
More information about the Gdal-dev