[gdal-dev] HFA_USE_RRD vs USE_RRD
Frank Warmerdam
warmerdam at pobox.com
Sat Aug 2 09:20:21 EDT 2008
Maciej Sieczka wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If I use the followiwng syntax:
>
> gdaladdo --config HFA_USE_RRD YES --config USE_RRD YES some.tif 2 4 8
>
> a small aux file and a big rrd file are created. If I use:
>
> gdaladdo --config USE_RRD YES some.tif 2 4 8
>
> only a big aux is created.
>
> In the 1st case the sum of aux and rrd file sizes is equal the size of
> the aux file from the 2nd case.
>
> What is the difference between the 2 methods, is any better (in what
> terms) and could gdaladdo man page please address these issues
> (currently it only mentions USE_RRD alone).
Maciek,
The HFA_USE_RRD was implemented at the request of a client to mimic the
behavior of another application. It isn't really any better than just
putting the overviews in the .aux file. If you file a ticket I'll try and
document things somewhat better.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list