[Gdal-dev] gtiff file size compared to original tiff +wrld file

[TJMartin]

excellent Even

thank you, i thought it was something else i had missed.





Even Rouault wrote:
> 
> yes, it is known that gdalwarp -co COMPRESS=LZW will yield to a larger
> file 
> than the one that you can obtain with gdal_translate. This is due to the
> how 
> gdalwarp works internally and there's no obvious way of fixing.
> 
> See http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/UserDocs/GdalWarp#a-coCOMPRESSisbroken
> and 
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/1688
> 
> Le Thursday 23 April 2009 22:35:45 TJMartin, vous avez écrit :
>> Simone - i posted here rather than over at Geoserver because it was the
>> gdal that i couldnt seem to get working rather than the method of loading
>> to geoserver.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/gtiff-file-size-compared-to-original-tiff-%2Bwrld-file-tp2672921p2686357.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.