[Gdal-dev] Compress via NTFS or in-image for performance?
maphew at gmail.com
Fri Aug 21 13:20:40 EDT 2009
Any thoughts on whether the best read/write performance vs disk space used
is achieved through file system compression or in-raster compression? The
former would be via Windows NTFS compact and the latter via TIFF LZW or
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Compress-via-NTFS-or-in-image-for-performance-tp3491435p3491435.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the gdal-dev