[gdal-dev] SWIG Version

[Collins, Benjamin]

1.3.39 produces code that does not compile on x64 Windows (at least with MSVC).  See: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2928.  The ticket mentions c# bindings but the same is true for the Java bindings.  Rolling back to 1.3.38 fixes the problem.  

--
Ben

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdal-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:gdal-dev-
> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Even Rouault
> Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 1:22 PM
> To: Frank Warmerdam
> Cc: gdal-dev
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] SWIG Version
> 
> I've been using SWIG 1.3.39 for Java bindings for a few months now, and
> it's working fine.
> 
> Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
> > Folks - particularly swig bindings maintainers,
> >
> > I have regenerated the swig bindings for python with swig 1.3.39 on
> > www.gdal.org and committed them.  I used that version to be
> compatible
> > with what Even used last time.  However, the scripts that building
> > the perl and csharp bindings for the nightly snapshots are still
> using
> > SWIG 1.3.36.
> >
> > Before GDAL 1.7 release, I'd like us to settle on a preferred version
> of
> > SWIG and I will update this to be the one used for the nightly
> snapshots
> > and that we would use at other times for building source
> distributions.
> >
> > Is SWIG 1.3.39 acceptable for all bindings maintainers?
> >
> > PS. SWIG 1.3.39 is built and installed in ~warmerdam/gdal-swig on
> > www.gdal.org (aka xblade14).   SWIG 1.3.36 is in /usr/local/bin.
> >
> > Best regards,
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev