[gdal-dev] Re: corner coords in tif vs ecw
kmayall at gmail.com
Thu Nov 4 14:25:52 EDT 2010
Sorry, I've been on hiatus for a while.
ECW Image Header Editor shows the top left coords using values from the
coordinate system (screenshot attached), while the gdalinfo results show the
corner coords in pixels.
So there's likely nothing wrong with my ecw file, just a quirk in the
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Jean-Claude Repetto [via OSGeo.org] <
ml-node+5612232-448933154-294829 at n2.nabble.com<ml-node%2B5612232-448933154-294829 at n2.nabble.com>
> On 10/06/10 19:48, kmayall wrote:
> > I used gdal_translate to convert a geotiff to an ecw file.
> > However, the corner coordinates are different between the two files.
> > The tiff uses values from the coordinate system, while the ecw seems to
> > use the tile dimensions.
> > I'm not sure if there is something different in how the two formats store
> > that data, or if there was an option I didn't use. Any insight is
> > appreciated. gdalinfo results for the tif and ecw are below.
> I noticed similar problems, and I think this may be a bug in gdalinfo.
> What does "ECW Header Editor" report about your ECW file ?
> gdal-dev mailing list
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5612232&i=0>
> View message @
> To unsubscribe from [gdal-dev] corner coords in tif vs ecw, click here<http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/template/TplServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5608144&code=a21heWFsbEBnbWFpbC5jb218NTYwODE0NHwtMTM2OTUxMTQ4NA==>.
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/gdal-dev-corner-coords-in-tif-vs-ecw-tp5608144p5706413.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gdal-dev