[gdal-dev] FGDB Opening Sample File

[Marius Jigmond]

They are links between tables. Usually, between the attribute table of a
feature class and a simple (non-spatial, as Mike said) table. But you
can relate any kind of attribute tables.

-marius

On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:30 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Are they tables or links between tables?  I can see this is going to
> be a hard project to do without ArcGIS handy :)
> 
> P.
> 
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH
> <michael.smith at usace.army.mil> wrote:
> > Relations are joins to non-spatial tables containing domain values etc. They
> > are relational tables.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michael Smith
> > Remote Sensing/GIS Center
> > US Army Corps of Engineers
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/28/11 1:19 PM, "Even Rouault" <even.rouault at mines-paris.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Le jeudi 28 avril 2011 02:11:30, Paul Ramsey a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> I assume the failures are relationships we don't handle yet (or ever
> >>> and will need to be silenced).
> >>>
> >>
> >> Not sure what those relations things are.
> >>
> >>> There is a test file in the FGDB API itself, and it fails to open
> >>> entirely, which seems odd,
> >>>
> >>> [pramsey at localhost data]$ ogrinfo ./TestData.gdb
> >>> ERROR 1: GDB Error: Failed to open Geodatabase long:-2147467259
> >>> ERROR 1: GDB Error: Failed to open Geodatabase long:-2147467259
> >>> FAILURE:
> >>> Unable to open datasource `./TestData.gdb' with the following drivers.
> >>>
> >>> Do other folks have trouble opening the ESRI sample file? The error
> >>> code doesn't make much sense, it is supposed to mean "If the path is
> >>> seriously in error, say pointing to the wrong drive, a -2147467259
> >>> (E_FAIL) error is returned" and relates to the CreateGeodatabase
> >>> method, not the OpenGeodatabase method.
> >>
> >> Yes I did notice that issue too. I assume either the example is corrupted,
> >> either it is a bug in the FileGDB API, either... Perhaps reporting to ESRI
> >> might be usefull. Or perhaps Ragi has some clues.
> >>
> >> Even
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gdal-dev mailing list
> >> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gdal-dev mailing list
> > gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>