[gdal-dev] ogr gml
Sebastian E. Ovide
sebastian.ovide at gmail.com
Thu Jan 6 04:27:44 EST 2011
That is a good news !
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Ralf Suhr <Ralf.Suhr at itc-halle.de> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> if you have a newer gdal version (1.8). ogrinfo will produce:
>
> Layer name: AddressPoint
> Geometry: Point
> Feature Count: 1
> Extent: (405525.600000, 628349.000000) - (405525.600000, 628349.000000)
> Layer SRS WKT:
> (unknown)
> version: Integer (0.0)
> versionDate: String (10.0)
> theme: String (7.0)
> matchStatus: String (7.0)
> physicalStatus: String (8.0)
> positionalQuality: String (5.0)
> structureType: String (18.0)
> OSAPR: String (18.0)
> buildingNumber: Integer (0.0)
> thoroughfare: String (8.0)
> dependentLocality: String (7.0)
> postTown: String (7.0)
> postCode: String (8.0)
> deliveryPointSuffix: String (2.0)
> postalAddressDate: String (10.0)
> OGRFeature(AddressPoint):0
> version (Integer) = 11
> versionDate (String) = 2009-10-12
> theme (String) = Address
> matchStatus (String) = Matched
> physicalStatus (String) = Existing
> positionalQuality (String) = Final
> structureType (String) = Permanent Building
> OSAPR (String) = AP6DJK8352W7DAUGJG
> buildingNumber (Integer) = 16
> thoroughfare (String) = WEST END
> dependentLocality (String) = CHATTON
> postTown (String) = ALNWICK
> postCode (String) = NE66 5PP
> deliveryPointSuffix (String) = 1Z
> postalAddressDate (String) = 2003-04-18
> POINT (405525.6 628349.0)
>
> Gr
> Ralf
>
> Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2011, 17:19:41 schrieb christopher.schmidt at nokia.com
> :
> > On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:13 AM, ext Sebastian E. Ovide wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > ogrinfo is skiping some fields my gml files....
> > >
> > > for example the fields addressStatus, matchStatus, physicalStatus,
> > > positionalQuality and structureType are not read...
> >
> > Those are complex fields, which OGR doesn't handle.
> >
> > -- Chris
> >
> > > <osgb:addressPointMember>
> > > <osgb:AddressPoint fid='osgb1000002193000088'>
> > > <osgb:version>11</osgb:version>
> > > <osgb:versionDate>2009-10-12</osgb:versionDate>
> > > <osgb:theme>Address</osgb:theme>
> > > <osgb:addressStatus>
> > > <osgb:matchStatus>Matched</osgb:matchStatus>
> > > <osgb:physicalStatus>Existing</osgb:physicalStatus>
> > > <osgb:positionalQuality
> > > accuracy='Surveyed'>Final</osgb:positionalQuality>
> > > <osgb:structureType>Permanent Building</osgb:structureType>
> > > </osgb:addressStatus>
> > > <osgb:OSAPR>AP6DJK8352W7DAUGJG</osgb:OSAPR>
> > > <osgb:point>
> > > <gml:Point srsName='osgb:BNG'>
> > > <gml:coordinates>405525.600,628349.000</gml:coordinates>
> > > </gml:Point>
> > > </osgb:point>
> > > <osgb:postalAddress>
> > > <osgb:buildingNumber>16</osgb:buildingNumber>
> > > <osgb:thoroughfare>WEST END</osgb:thoroughfare>
> > > <osgb:dependentLocality>CHATTON</osgb:dependentLocality>
> > > <osgb:postTown>ALNWICK</osgb:postTown>
> > > <osgb:postCode type='Small'>NE66 5PP</osgb:postCode>
> > > <osgb:deliveryPointSuffix>1Z</osgb:deliveryPointSuffix>
> > > </osgb:postalAddress>
> > > <osgb:postalAddressDate>2003-04-18</osgb:postalAddressDate>
> > > <osgb:referenceToTopographicArea xlink:href='#osgb1000036885604'/>
> > > </osgb:AddressPoint>
> > > </osgb:addressPointMember>
> > >
> > > any ideas ?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gdal-dev mailing list
> > gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
--
Sebastian E. Ovide
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20110106/7e9c6d38/attachment-0001.html
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list