[gdal-dev] proposed changes to netcdf export behaviour (perhaps RFC)

[Even Rouault]

> > As PSC chair I will not be offended if you proceed with netcdf changes
> > *without* a formal RFC type vote on the changes.  The changes are fixing
> > bugs and don't cause real backward compatability issues and I'm willing
> > to treat you as the authority/owner for the driver.
> 
> OK Frank, many thanks for you support and trust

I also totally share Frank's opinion. All the efforts you have lead seem to 
have been carefully thought about and are well documented (in the wiki, but 
frmt_netcdf.html would perhaps need updates). Plus I'd have difficulties to vote 
for a RFC with an enlightened mind on such a specialized topic ;-)

How will you proceed to updating in SVN ? A big code drop, or apply 
incremental changes ? Personnaly, I tend to prefer micro changes to be able to 
track regressions more easily, but it might be hard with the workflow you 
followed using git? I'd note that merging a svn branch in trunk would also 
loose incremental steps. That's just questions to satisfy my curiosity: I 
don't ask you to "rewrite history" as they seem to do in Linux kernel 
development.

> 
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > ---------------------------------------+---------------------------------
> > ----- I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
> > warmerdam at pobox.com
> > light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/warmerda
> > and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev