[gdal-dev] state of RFC #26 adoption?

[Tamas Szekeres]

Hi Konstantin,

As far as I remember, I'd require some further testing efforts to make sure
the code is feasible in all conditions. This RFC targets a fairly
substantial part of the code, that should be handled with care. But the
client who required this fix (with the intent to fix problems addressing
TMS tiles at large zoom levels) went ahead with another solution to the
problem, so this addition has become quite neglected.

Did you run into a similar issue, which would also validate this change?

Best regards,

Tamas




2012/11/1 Konstantin Baumann <Konstantin.Baumann at autodesk.com>

> Hi all,
>
> what is the current state of the adoption and implementation of RFC #26 (
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc26_blockcache)? Are there any plans to
> finalize the development for it?
>
> -Konstantin
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20121101/cca1d99a/attachment.html>