[gdal-dev] Which version number for the next GDAL release : 1.10 or 2.0 ?

[rburhum]

Perhaps calling it 2.0 is not a bad thing and it sounds of less of a hassle.
Breaking the ABI (by rushing major API changes) just so that the semantics
of what "2.0" means, seems inappropriate. If/when the unification starts, we
could bump it to 3.0, 4.0 or any other number. There are quite a few of them
we could use :p

my two cents,

Ragi



--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Which-version-number-for-the-next-GDAL-release-1-10-or-2-0-tp5014634p5015202.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.