[gdal-dev] Suggestion for API addition

[Even Rouault]

> now it's my turn to be confused.
> This is pixel-by-pixel copy of a subset of the input pixels. It is a
> subwindow of the original image, exactly as you say.
> I'm taking an m x n input image and copying p x q pixels (p <= m, q <=n)
> into p x q pixels in the band. The scale is unchanged.

Ah indeed, if you consider the point of view of the buffer, not the GDAL 
raster, that makes some sense...

Honestly I'm still not convinced. I let your proposal to other GDAL developers 
that might be interested.

> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev