[gdal-dev] "reboxing," or 3D regridding

Chris Barker chris.barker at noaa.gov
Wed Nov 14 15:10:14 PST 2012


Tom,

I'd look for re-gridding code designed for modeling -- in particular
ESMF has a bunch of good stuff, designed specifically for this sort of
thing:

http://www.earthsystemmodeling.org/

They even have python bindings to at lest some of the re-gridding code.

-Chris



On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche at pobox.com> wrote:
>
> summary: I'd appreciate advice regarding tools and methods for
> transforming values from an unprojected global 3D spatial grid to a
> projected 3D grid with different horizontal and vertical resolution, or
> pointers to other resources to consult.
>
> details:
>
> I have output from a global atmospheric model that I'd like to use as
> initial and boundary conditions for a regional model. The global input
> netCDF has dimensions=2.5° lon x 1.875° lat x 56 vertical levels. The
> regional model runs over North America using a 12-km grid projected
> Lambert Comformal Conic (LCC), with 34 vertical levels. Since its top
> height is less than that of the global input, the extents of the output
> domain are fully contained within the input domain.
>
> Each box or voxel defined by the global input grid contains an estimate
> for the N2O concentration for that volume. From those I want to compute
> the concentrations for each output gridbox volume. I'd appreciate your
> recommendations for tools that can handle this usecase. Particularly, is
> this something that gdalwarp can do?
>
> FWIW, the best tool I've seen so far is R package=gstat, but (IIUC)
>
> - gstat expects projected input. I'm not sure if I can work around that
>   for this usecase.
>
> - as the name implies, 'gstat' is doing geostatistics, e.g., variogram-
>   and covariance-based modeling. I'm not sure either how to setup the
>   distance weighting for my scenario, and, frankly, I remain unconvinced
>   that a statistical approach is necessary for this application (though
>   it may be a sufficient or the best-available approach). This may be
>   due to my statistical ignorance, however.
>
> your assistance is appreciated, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche at pobox.com>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev



-- 

Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chris.Barker at noaa.gov


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list