[gdal-dev] S57 dataset boundary issue
s duclos
sylvain_duclos at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 10 06:32:30 PDT 2012
Nikhil,
I loaded your ENC.
I see a number of depth area (DEPARE) and anchor zone area (ACHARE).
But no inner ring!
Is there an inner rings somewhere I should see?
rgds,
Sylvain.
----- Original Message -----
> From: Nikhil Sai Parupalli <nikhil.parupalli at iictechnologies.com>
> To: s duclos <sylvain_duclos at yahoo.com>; Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>
> Cc: "gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:00:41 AM
> Subject: RE: [gdal-dev] S57 dataset boundary issue
>
> Duclos,
>
> Please see this sample data attached.
> So as per the code given by you we have tried and got result i.e able to find
> out area
>
> some times it shows area<0 and some times area>0 hence we get CW and CCW.
> But how do we classify in layer which is outer boundary and which is inner
> boundary
>
>
>
>
> Geometry testgeo = geomLAKARE.GetBoundary();
> double area = 0;
> for (int l = 0; l <
> testgeo.GetPointCount() - 1; l++)
> {
> double x1 = testgeo.GetX(l);
> double y1 = testgeo.GetY(l);
> double x2 = testgeo.GetX(l + 1);
> double y2 = testgeo.GetY(l + 1);
> area += (x1 * y2) - (x2 * y1);
> }
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Nikhil Sai Parupalli
>
>
>
> Note: Do not print this email until and unless it is really required. Save paper
> , stay Green
>
> ________________________________________
> From: s duclos [sylvain_duclos at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:58 PM
> To: Frank Warmerdam; Nikhil Sai Parupalli
> Cc: gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] S57 dataset boundary issue
>
> Frank & Nikhil,
>
>
> Frank asked:
>
>> are, I'm not sure what I or others can do about
>> the performance cost of checking.
>
>
> If I understand the problem, then it cost nothing!
>
> You have to check the winding while loading a OGRGeometryH
> like so:
> double area = 0;
> for (unsigned int i=0; i<vert_count-1; i++) {
> double x1 = OGR_G_GetX(hRing, i);
> double y1 = OGR_G_GetY(hRing, i);
> double x2 = OGR_G_GetX(hRing, i+1);
> double y2 = OGR_G_GetY(hRing, i+1);
> area += (x1*y2) - (x2*y1);
> }
>
>
> If the area < 0 then it is CW (clockwise) and > 0 is CCW (Counter CW).
>
> Note that in S57 the exterior ring must be CW and
> interior ring are CCW.
>
> But in S57 there is no order between rings. So interior ring
> might come first. I think WKT fix this. In my code I assume
> that OGR place the exterior ring first.
>
>
> We have been trough this before. At the time the question
>
> was if S57 allow for many exterior ring for the same poly.
>
> I guess it all depend on HO and how they encode the data.
>
> I'm using mostly Canadian ENC and found no problem.
>
> But other HO might encode ENC differently ..
>
>
>
>
> rdgs,
>
>
> Sylvain Duclos.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>
>> To: Nikhil Sai Parupalli <nikhil.parupalli at iictechnologies.com>
>> Cc: "gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2012 12:25:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] S57 dataset boundary issue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Nikhil Sai Parupalli
> <nikhil.parupalli at iictechnologies.com> wrote:
>>
>> HI All,
>>> ,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply in below data
>>>
>>> NAME_RCNM (IntegerList) = (7:130,130,130,130,130,130,130)
>>> NAME_RCID (IntegerList) = (7:691,391,690,52,1336,1503,1512)
>>> ORNT (IntegerList) = (7:2,2,2,2,1,1,1)
>>> USAG (IntegerList) = (7:1,1,1,1,1,1,1)
>>> MASK (IntegerList) = (7:255,255,255,255,255,255,255)
>>>
>>> RCID 691 ORNT has 2 and USAG is 1 based on this data we could identify
> that RCID 691 is of exterior boundary with reverse direction.
>>>
>>> So if I have 1000 RCID in NAME_RCID which is vise versa for the above
> condition I need to display that RCIDS list as errors.
>>> So it makes 1000 conditional checks hence reducing performance.
>>>
>>> Please let us know further.
>>
>>
>> Nikhil,
>>
>>
>> I'm afraid I don't follow your point. Are you trying to
>> do some sort of ring orientation validation and identify
>> ones that don't match your expectations? And you
>> are concerned about the performance cost?
>>
>>
>> I don't know why you are doing this, and if you
>> are, I'm not sure what I or others can do about
>> the performance cost of checking.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,--
>> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
>> I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam,
> warmerdam at pobox.com
>> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
>> and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>
>>
>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list