[gdal-dev] GDAL RPC protocol to make GDAL (more) failsafe
Dmitriy Baryshnikov
bishop.dev at gmail.com
Wed Feb 6 09:48:23 PST 2013
Mateusz
+1
I vote for GDAL_API_PROXY.
Best regards,
Dmitriy
06.02.2013 20:40, Mateusz Loskot пишет:
> On 6 February 2013 16:33, Even Rouault <even.rouault at mines-paris.org> wrote:
>> All in all, i'm ok with GDAL_PROXY if nobody else has a better suggestion.
> GDAL_API_RPC
> GDAL_API_PROXY
> GDAL_API_SERVER
>
> to clearly indicate the purpose: interacting with API calls.
> Otherwise, it may be easily confused with i.e. Web features and such.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list