[gdal-dev] Call for discussion for "RFC 41 : Support for multiple geometry fields in OGR"

[Even Rouault]

> Impressive, logical, complete, and verbose.
> 
> The only small addition I might suggest is a driver capabilities flag to
> announce whether or not it has multiple geometry field support. It could
> simply be the driver that has not been updated to support multiple
> geometry fields or the fact that the driver's model itself doesn't fit the
> idea of multiple geometry fields. In either case, it would be good to be
> able to ask.

Hi Howard,

Too verbose maybe ;-) , since you probably missed the (discrete) mention to 
the OLCCreateGeomField capability (at layer level since CreateGeomField() is a 
OGRLayer method)

Even

-- 
Geospatial professional services
http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html