[gdal-dev] Status of patch for RFC40 ?

[Sam Gillingham]

Hi Even,

http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5129

Yes I have recently updated the patch with the changes you and Frank
suggested to GetValueAsString so the returned pointer is temporary. I have
also changed the definition of GetDefaultRAT to return a non-const pointer
and updated relevant drivers.

I'm actually just doing some final testing on my HFA patches and hope to
have something to you in the next few hours. These will rely on the first
ones being applied obviously. Up to you whether you apply them all at once,
or as I submit them. Any feedback on the currently attached patch would be
great.

Thanks,
Sam.


On 21 June 2013 08:47, Even Rouault <even.rouault at mines-paris.org> wrote:

> Hi Sam,
>
> I see you've attached recently a patch in
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support that does the
> refactoring of GDALRasterAttributeTable vs GDALTableRasterAttributeTable.
> Do
> you intend it to be committed in trunk before tackling the implementation
> in
> the HFA driver ?
>
> I'd suggest you open a ticket in Trac to follow more easily the
> implementation
> of RFC 40.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Even
>
> --
> Geospatial professional services
> http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20130621/617e3a2d/attachment.html>