[gdal-dev] Raster Attribute Table RFC

[Frank Warmerdam]

Sam,

It looks good to me, though I'm dubious about the value of treating
booleans as Byte instead of integer.

Best regards,
Frank



On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Sam Gillingham <gillingham.sam at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I propose a motion to get RFC 40 - "Improving performance of Raster
> Attribute Table implementation for large tables" adopted. This adds some
> new functionality for GDAL 2.0. Even and others have made suggestions and
> these have been incorporated into the RFC:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support
>
> Thanks,
> Sam.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>



-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20130514/f251589b/attachment.html>