[gdal-dev] Raster Attribute Table RFC
Sam Gillingham
gillingham.sam at gmail.com
Wed May 15 14:58:21 PDT 2013
Etienne, Frank,
The original idea was to save space with the byte type, although I admit
bools are a rather unusual case. If we represent them as ints it might be
more straightforward just to use the int form of ValuesIO instead. How
about removing the bool form of ValuesIO and should a future driver support
bools it can treat them as ints?
Sam
On 15 May 2013 09:52, Etienne Tourigny <etourigny.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>wrote:
>
>> Sam,
>>
>> It looks good to me, though I'm dubious about the value of treating
>> booleans as Byte instead of integer.
>>
>
> everywhere else booleans are defined as integers like this
>
> int bSomeVar;
>
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Frank
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Sam Gillingham <gillingham.sam at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I propose a motion to get RFC 40 - "Improving performance of Raster
>>> Attribute Table implementation for large tables" adopted. This adds some
>>> new functionality for GDAL 2.0. Even and others have made suggestions and
>>> these have been incorporated into the RFC:
>>>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sam.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gdal-dev mailing list
>>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
>> I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam,
>> warmerdam at pobox.com
>> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
>> and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20130516/ea8fe3dd/attachment.html>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list