[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 40 - "Improving performance of Raster Attribute Table implementation for large tables"

[Howard Butler]

+1 Howard

I don't necessarily agree with the statement that this is a GDAL 2.0 item, however. We have plenty of examples of changing the C++ API and simply adding new stuff to the C API.  There's no reason why this can't go into GDAL 1.11, if that's what our next release is called, if the the C API does not change and only additions are made to support the new functionality.

I'm not sure I like the method name, ValuesIO, so much, but I don't have a better suggestion. Not that I like the name RasterIO either ;) 

Howard

/me is good at neither naming nor caching.

On May 19, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com> wrote:

> +1 Frank
> 
> 
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Sam Gillingham <gillingham.sam at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear PSC members,
> 
> I propose a motion to get RFC 40 - "Improving performance of Raster Attribute Table implementation for large tables" formally adopted. 
> 
> This adds some new functionality for GDAL 2.0. Even, Frank and others have made suggestions and these have been incorporated into the RFC:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support
> 
> I'll start with a:
> 
> +1 from me
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Sam.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev