[gdal-dev] Motion: Promote 1.11.0RC1 for release

Kurt Schwehr schwehr at gmail.com
Sun Apr 20 09:20:58 PDT 2014 

The proj.4 comment confuses me...

./configure ... --with-static-proj4=/sw ...

checking how to link PROJ.4 library... link statically.
checking for pj_init in -lproj... yes

  Statically link PROJ.4:    yes

What am I missing?



The jpeg and png issues are (if I remember the discussions a few months
back) expected.

fink list -i proj libjpeg libpng16 | grep -v system
 i libjpeg-bin 9a-1 Executables for libjpeg package
 i libjpeg9 9a-1 JPEG image format handling library
 i libjpeg9-shlibs 9a-1 Shared libraries for libjpeg package
 i libpng16 1.6.10-1 PNG image format handling library
 i libpng16-shlibs 1.6.10-1 Shared libraries for libpng16 package
 i proj 4.8.0-3 Cartographic projections library
 i proj-bin 4.8.0-3 Cartographic projections library
 i proj-shlibs 4.8.0-3 Cartographic projections library

otool -L /sw/bin/gdalinfo  | egrep 'jpeg|png'
/sw/lib/libjpeg.9.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, current version
11.0.0)
/sw/lib/libpng16.16.dylib (compatibility version 27.0.0, current version
27.0.0)












On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Even Rouault
<even.rouault at mines-paris.org>wrote:

> Le dimanche 20 avril 2014 17:36:58, Kurt Schwehr a écrit :
> > Pretty much everything working with fink on the mac on 10.9 with xcode
> 5.1
> > and fink's python 2.7.  Test results below.  Created one new issue.
>
> Most of the failed tests are due to the fact that you don't have proj.4
> installed : it is pretty much a requirement for successfull tests. The Mac
> Travis CI instance used to pass the tests (when it built...)
>
> JPEG failed tests must be due to libjpeg 9 and subtle differences in
> compression/decompression. You could likely add the checksum values you
> get in
> the possible expected values.
>
> Not sure why you get failures with osm however. Would be interesting to
> compare with GDAL 1.10.1.
>
> The failures in png_copy_icc might perhaps be due to the libpng version you
> are using.
>
> >
> > -kurt
> >
> > test_gdaltindex4 failing: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5440
> >
> > Packaging files:
> >
> https://github.com/schwehr/fink-10.9/tree/1fd286b6f90a56803c8838789e1b84080
> > a7c386b/libs
> >
> > Autotest results: http://schwehr.org/gdal/gdal-1.11.0RC1-autotest.txt
> >
> > Succeeded: 2876
> > Failed:    42 (10 blew exceptions)
> > Skipped:   753
> > Expected fail:12
> > Duration:  05m34.0s
> > As GDAL_DOWNLOAD_TEST_DATA environment variable is not defined, 109 tests
> > relying on data to downloaded from the Web have been skipped
> > As GDAL_RUN_SLOW_TESTS environment variable is not defined, 22 "slow"
> tests
> > have been skipped
> >
> > grep fail gdal-1.11.0RC1-autotest.txt | grep TEST
> >   TEST: ogr_couchdb_SetAttributeFilter ... ERROR 1: Filter creation
> failed
> >
> > : unauthorized, You are not a db or server admin.
> >
> >   TEST: gdal_api_proxy_3 ... Fails on MacOSX ('ERROR 1: posix_spawnp()
> > failed'. Not sure why.
> >   TEST: jpeg_1 ... fail
> >
> >
> >     line 435: Checksum for band 2 in "albania.jpg" is 34296, but expected
> > 17016.
> >
> > fink list -i libjpeg
> >  i   libjpeg9-shlibs           9a-1                Shared libraries for
> > libjpeg package
> >
> >
> >   TEST: lcp_17 ... expected_fail
> >   TEST: mbtiles_2 ... fail
> >   TEST: mem_6 ... python(82931,0x7fff7b8b0310) malloc: ***
> > mach_vm_map(size=18446744004990078976) failed (error code=3)
> >   TEST: rasterlite_2 ... fail
> >   TEST: webp_2 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdaltindex_4 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdaltindex_5 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_18 ... fail
> >   TEST: ogr_osm_3 ... fail (blowup)
> >   TEST: ogr_osm_3_sqlite_nodes ... fail (blowup)
> >   TEST: ogr_osm_3_custom_compress_nodes ... fail (blowup)
> >   TEST: ogr_osm_6 ... fail
> >   TEST: basic_test_8 ... fail
> >   TEST: http_4 ... fail
> >   TEST: jpeg_1 ... fail
> >   TEST: jpeg_16 ... fail
> >   TEST: jpeg2000_8 ... fail
> >   TEST: mbtiles_2 ... fail
> >   TEST: png_copy_icc ... fail (blowup)
> >   TEST: png_copy_options_icc ... fail (blowup)
> >   TEST: rasterlite_2 ... fail
> >   TEST: webp_2 ... fail
> >   TEST: webp_3 ... fail
> >   TEST: webp_4 ... fail
> >   TEST: warp_27 ... fail (blowup)
> >   TEST: warp_38 ... fail
> >   TEST: warp_39 ... fail
> >   TEST: warp_39 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalinfo_11 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalinfo_13 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdaltindex_4 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdaltindex_5 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdaltransform_5 ... fail (blowup)
> >   TEST: test_gdaltransform_7 ... fail (blowup)
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_4 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_15 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_18 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_24 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_25 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_26 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_27 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_28 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_29 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_30 ... fail (blowup)
> >   TEST: test_gdalwarp_31 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_ogr2ogr_18 ... fail (blowup)
> >   TEST: test_ogr2ogr_46 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_ogr2ogr_47 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_ogrinfo_12 ... fail
> >   TEST: test_ogrlineref_1 ... fail
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Even Rouault
> >
> > <even.rouault at mines-paris.org>wrote:
> > > Le dimanche 20 avril 2014 16:21:40, Martin Landa a écrit :
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 2014-04-20 16:03 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <
> even.rouault at mines-paris.org>:
> > > > > Motion: GDAL/OGR 1.11.0RC1 is promoted to be the official 1.11.0
> > > > > final release.
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > No critical issue has been specifically reported on RC1 so far, so
> I
> > > > > invite PSC members to vote on this motion after doing your own
> > > > > testing and validation. Input from everyone else who can test it is
> > > > > also very welcome.
> > > >
> > > > sorry for the noise, I would just expect that RC period will take
> > > > about two weeks. In any case no objections, just my 2eurocents,
> Martin
> > >
> > > There is no hard rule for that. In the past, AFAICS, the vote for
> > > promoting a
> > > RC was asked just 2 or 3 days after issuing it. And Beta1 was released
> on
> > > the
> > > 4th, so more than 2 weeks. I don't see the benefit in waiting more,
> > > unless there are people who would express the need for some more time
> to
> > > test it. I think that there are 2 categories of people : early adopters
> > > who track trunk
> > > on a regular basis, or more cautious users who wait for the official
> > > release.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Geospatial professional services
> > > http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gdal-dev mailing list
> > > gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
> --
> Geospatial professional services
> http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
>



-- 
--
http://schwehr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20140420/b360af7d/attachment.html>

More information about the gdal-dev mailing list