[gdal-dev] Adding a "Commercial support" section on gdal.org?

[Daniel Morissette]

I think a commercial support section would be a great idea, but as 
others have said, managing it can be tricky. Not all users know how to 
analyze the list archives to find the best person to help them with a 
specific problem, so this support page would help both the users and the 
service providers to find each other.

I think David's suggestion of self-registration with a flag for 
committers and some objective measures of contributions/participation 
readily available may be the best way to go.

Daniel

On 14-08-21 3:48 PM, David Strip wrote:
> As Frank  wrote, this is a slippery issue. Personally I could be
> comfortable with anything from self-registration to the highly selective
> approach described by Frank. To me, the important issue is making clear
> to a reader of the list what exactly the list means and how to use that
> to interpret the skills of those on the list.
>
> One way to use this list is as a reward to significant contributors to
> project. This would tend to point to those most familiar with the
> internals of the project, as well as having a broad commitment to the
> project and the notion of an open source community.  Of course this
> requires a voting process, presumably by the PSC, which can be
> burdensome and stressful, as Frank notes. While I have found this
> project community to be generally welcoming, open source projects
> somewhat deservedly have a reputation for being insular and hard to
> crack. (For a great read, check out this article.
> <http://www.infoworld.com/t/open-source-software/how-crack-open-source-community-248352?source=IFWNLE_nlt_stradev_2014-08-19>
> Worth reading just for a remarkably intolerant response from Linus
> Torvalds on the merits of C++). A vetted list of names carries an
> implied endorsement, which is valuable to the reader, but carries a risk
> for the committee that chooses the list. (I'm not talking risk in the
> legal sense, though that could occur, I suppose. More the reflection on
> how the community chooses who to include or exclude.)
>
> As the other extreme, we allow anyone to register and hopefully provide
> some guidance in how to choose amongst them. For example, suggest that
> people search the archives of this mailing list to see how often the
> consultant participates. Put a star next to names who have commit
> privileges, perhaps the date the achieved this status, so you can tell
> how long they've been active. There are many ways to objectively
> identify the stronger contributors while remaining open. I am tempted to
> suggest even allowing endorsements, but policing that against spam,
> abuse, fraud is probably more work than it's worth.
>
> My choice leans to an open list of self-registrants with some
> /objective/ measures of their participation, but I'll probably be
> content with whatever the community decides.
>
>
>
> On 8/21/2014 11:02 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> This is a somewhat sticky area, which is why I started just with just
>> the self-registration mechanism on the OSGeo site in the past.
>>
>> A scenario that I could support would be a section somewhat like the
>> postgis.net <http://postgis.net> support list where being added to it
>> needs to be voted on by the PSC.  My criteria as a PSC member would be:
>>
>>  - The organization has made significant contributions to the project
>> (in code, docs, etc)
>>  - The organization has staff that I personally know to be competent
>> GDAL/OGR developers.
>>
>> It is a slippery sort of thing of course.  Subjective, and I would
>> hate to be in the situation where I'm having to vote against an addition.
>>
>> If we were to pursue this I actually think an RFC with an initial list
>> of entries, and some general principles would be appropriate (though
>> additions wouldn't need an RFC - just a up/down vote).
>>
>> My perspective when consulting was that being active on the mailing
>> list, and noting in my email signature that I was available for
>> consulting was enough to give me some profile with those looking for
>> someone.
>>
>> PS. as happy customer of Even's (at Planet Labs) I can strongly
>> endorse him as a consultant!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Frank
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>


-- 
Daniel Morissette
T: +1 418-696-5056 #201
http://www.mapgears.com/
Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000